| HomeLegal & Administrative Court Judgement The Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 |
|
The Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 |
|
27
2001 (90) FLR 666
(Gujarat High Court-DB) |
|
| Between |
|
SURAT MAHILA NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.
And
MAMTABEN MAHENDRABHAI JOSHI |
|
| Industrial Disputes Act, 1947- Sections 2 (oo) and 25-F- Bombay Industrial Relation Act, 1946-Sections 78 and 79- Termination of services- Unfair Labor practice-Respondent employed for one month with break at the end of month- Worked as such from March 1991 to 3rd February 1992-She was given tenure appointed orders, which was extended beyond 240 days-Her services were terminated even though the work was still in existence-Benefit of nature of tenure order cannot be taken by the management-It would amount to unfair Labor practice-Order of reinstatement therefore confirmed with 50% back wages. |
|
28
[2001 (91) FLR 127]
(BOMBAY HIGH COURT) |
|
| Between |
|
JAYWANT GANPATRAO DALVI
And
KOLHAPUR DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD. |
|
| Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946-Section 3 (13) -Termination of services- Services of petitioner, an employee of bank, terminated- Petitioner was working as the Chief Executive Officer-Holding an administrative and supervisory post and drawing basic salary of more than Rs. 1000/--He can not be an' employee' within the definition under Section 3 (13) of Act. |
|
|