Bihar. -In Cl. (b) of sub-section (2) of Sec. 22-B of the said Act, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:

“Provided that the Court, if it is satisfied that the State Government or any officer authorised by it in this behalf was prevented by sufficient cause from sanctioning the making of the complaint within the period specified in sub-section (2) shall condone the delay and allow the complaint to be made even after the expiry of the said period.”1

Gujarat. - In Sec. 22-B, for Cl. (b) of sub-section (2), substitute the following:

“(b) Under Sec. 22-A, unless the complaint there of is made within six months of the date on which the offense becomes known to the Inspector.”2

Madhya Pradesh. - In Sec. 22-B, -

(1) In sub-section (1), in Cl. (a), for the words “unless an application in respect of the facts constituting such offense has been presented under Sec. 20”, substitute the words “unless a claim under Sec. 20 has been preferred before the authority”; and

(2) In sub-section (2), Cl. (a), for the words “one month”, substitute the words “three months'. 3