|  | | Labour Commissionerate | | Labour & Employment Department, Government of Gujarat |
| |
|
| |  |  |  | | |
| | Home E-Citizen Act & Rules The Contract Labour Act Salient Features of the Act | | Salient Features of the Act | | | Important Sections | | | Applicability | Section 1(4) (State Amendments, applied employees employed 10 or more contract workers) | | Appropriate Government | Section 2(a) | | Contractor | Section 2(c) | | Establishment | Section 2(e) | | Principle employer | Section 2(g) | | Wages | Section 2(h) | | Workman | Section 2(i) | | Appointments of Registering officer & licensing officer | Section (6) & Section (11) | | Registration of certain establishments & licensing of contractors | Section (7) & section (12) | | Revocation of Registration | Section (8) | | Revocation, suspension and amendment of license | Section (14) | | Appeal | Section (15) | | Provision for welfare and health of the contract labour - Canteen, rest room, drinking water, latrine, urinals, Fist aid facilities etc. Chapter (V) | Section (16 to 20) | | Responsibilities for payment of | Section 21 wages. |
| | | Important Judgements | | 24 01-I-LLJ-763 (SC) Between Barat Fritz Werner Ltd. and Others And State of Karnataka | | | Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sec. 10 - Factories Act, 1948 - Secs. 2(n) and 46 - Notification by Karnataka Government dated April 11, 1997, prohibiting employment of contract labor in industrial canteens and factories employing 250 workers or above, in State of Karnataka, challenged in writ petitions, which were dismissed - Provision of canteen welfare measure - Requirement to run it, incidental to main activity of establishment hence workmen in canteen held were engaged directly as workers in factory - Petitions found to be without merit and therefore dismissed : | | 25 [2001 (91) FLR 182] (SUPREME COURT) | | Civil Appeal Nos. 6009-6010 of 2001 With (C.A.No. 6011/2001 @ S.L.P. (C) No.20926/1998, C.A.No. 6012/2001 @ S.L.P. (C) No.9568/2000, T.C.N). 1/2000, T.C.Nos. 5 to 7/2000, T.C. (C) No. 14/2000, T.C.Nos. 17 & 18/2000, C.A.Nos. 719-720/2001,C.A.Nos.5798-99/98, C.A. Nos. 6013-22/2001 @ S.L.P. (C) Nos. 16122-31/98, C.A. No. 6023/2001 @ SLP(C) No. 19391/99, C.A.Nos. 4188-94/98, C.A.No.4195/98, C.A. Nos. 6024-25/2001 @SLP (C) Nos.8282-83/2000, TP (C) NO. 169/2000, TP (C) Nos. 284-302/2000, C.A.No. 6029 @ SLP (C) No. 16346/2000, C.A.NoS. 6030-34/2001 @ SLP (C) Nos. 13146-150/2000, TP (C) No. 308-337/2000, C.A.No. 141/2001) | | August 30, 2001 Between STEEL AUTHORITY OF India LTD. And others And NATIONAL UNION WATERS FRONT WORKERS and others | | | Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1070-Section 10(1)-Industrial Disputes Act, 1947-Section 2(a)-Abolition of contract Labor-Issuing notification for -Appropriate Government in respect of an establishment-Whether State or Central Government-Determination of question depends upon the answer of question-Whether the industry is carried on by or under the authority of Central Government-To be ascertained on facts and circumstances of each case-After 28.11.1986, in view of new definition of the expression "Appropriate Government"-The answer to question has to be found in clause (a) of Section 2 of Industrial Disputes Act. | | | | |
| | Copyright © 2009 Labour Commissionerate. All Rights Reserved. This page is last updated on : 19/7/2010
| |
| |
| |
|